Today's Most Popular
Switch to ICD-10 should be very costly
New organization studies role of healthcare applications on cell phones
PRoFESS Trial: Stroke Recurrence Comparable with Aspirin Plus Extended-Release Dipyridamole or Clopidogrel Alone
Worldwide Survey Shows People Underestimate Health Behaviors' Link to Cancer
Trend: Number of tools to remotely collect health data growing
Universal Healthcare Without Politics
Diabetics, Keep Exercising
Wirral PCT faces local data privacy backlash
Viigo Software for your Smartphone
Nissan Buy Outs, Employment News - EmploymentCrossing.Com
Switch to ICD-10 should be very costly
Health IT administrators are far from done in their struggles to implement the new National Provider Identifier number, which has proved to be every bit as troublesome as the industry predicted. But apparently, HHS was determined to raise the angst level further. With its recent announcement that it was pushing for an October 2011 deadline for the industry to switch from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10 codes, health organizations are bracing themselves for millions in additional IT and operational expenses.
ICD-9-CM codes, which are used for electronic claims processing, remittance, advice, eligibility inquiries, referral authorizations and more, have been in place for 30 years, but most other developed nations around the world use ICD-10 codes. The new code set will allow clinical IT systems to record far more specific and rich diagnostic information than ICD-9 codes, as it contains more than 155,000 codes, while ICD-9 contains only 17,000.
However, as readers can well imagine, such a switch will prove to be immensely complex, not to mention quite costly. While estimates vary from one consulting firm to another, HHS estimates the cost of the switch at $1.64 million industry-wide, including $356 million in training costs, lost productivity costs of $572 million and system change costs of $713 million. Meanwhile, HHS has estimated that health IT vendors should take on $55 million to $137 million in initial costs as they adopt their products to the new requirements.
Then, there's the reimbursement nightmares to come. HHS admits that the switch--like the NPI cutover--could initially cause significant cash flow problems for providers because of the increased risk of payment hold-ups due to coding and systems problems. HHS is predicting that claims-error rates will rise between 6 and 10 percent of all claims at the ICD-10 implementation date, up from a normal 3 percent rate typically seen for annual updates of ICD-9. Ugh--stock up on Excedrin, folks.
To learn more about the HHS proposal:
- read this Modern Healthcare piece (reg. req.)
Related Articles:
HHS proposes 2011 deadline for ICD-10 code adoption
CMS now says NPI must match IRS data
More Stories in Fierce Health IT
- Using email to save lives
- Forum: IT won't help much until practices shift operations
- Case study: George Washington University Hospital improves communication
- DOD, VA move to SOA architecture to build interopereable systems
- Study: EMRs can cut paid malpractice settlements
Other Feedables
White Sox Feeds - where you drink your dinner.- Chicago News - home of the deep dish
Marketing Feeds - A full plate of branding.
Everything Video - Because your eyes are bigger than your stomach.
iPhone Feeds - For The Mobile Apple- more feedables...
Feedables.com